Last night I was watching a biography of L.M. Montgomery. It was fascinating. It focused a lot on her recently published journals.
In the biography, it was all Anne this and Anne that. There was a mention of Emily of New Moon, but that was it. My favourite book of hers, The Blue Castle, wasn’t even mentioned.
The main thesis around the biography seemed to lie in the contrast between L.M. Montgomery and her intrepid heroine, Anne.
Years ago, while coming back from Nova Scotia we visited Green Gables in P.E.I. It was beautiful, but unfortunately what they ‘ve done to the little house Lucy Maud made so famous is the exact opposite of what Anne would have wanted. It’s gone commercial! All it needs is an amusement park and the transformation will be complete.
It was a fine day, and the grounds were full, everybody taking a tour of the little house with the green gables. I loved the haunted wood. It was different from what I expected, basically being a thicket of some kind of evergreen where the lower branches were silvery and bare. It was very quiet along the path.
The people at the house told us we should check out the place where Montgomery had actually grown up. I told the ladies in attendance that Anne of Green Gables was not my favourite book of Montgomery’s. My favourite has been The Blue Castle. One of the lady’s eyes lit up. The Blue Castle was her favourite too.
Montgomery’s home was only a few miles down the road. There was a room upstairs, with a sloping roof, painted yellow that must be the exact one that Montgomery describes as Valancy’s bedroom in The Blue Castle.
In The Blue Castle Valancy deals with a very *cold* mother, and apparently this character was based on her grandparents whom she lived with.
Her father had gone out west and remarried, Montgomery grew up with very stern grandparents, which is why, some argue, that she was able to write so convincingly of being an orphan.
Montgomery didn’t marry the person she was most fond of. She married a handsome reverend named Ewan MacDonald.
My Guyanese in-laws have a saying. “She pick pick and she pick shit.” It refers to women who are too picky when it comes to getting married. I was reminded of this saying when I was listening to Montgomery’s biography.
Why did she marry this guy? Anne would not have!
Neither would Valancy.
But the guy she liked was poor and without status.
Authors often write about what people long to do, and yet when it comes to it, these authors must live in real society. Unfortunately, L.M. Montgomery didn’t have the courage that Anne and Valancy did.
And as a result, she suffered for it.
By the way, it’s been said that Bernard Snaith, the good-looking rake that Valancy Sterling eventually marries, bears a striking resemblance to the guy L.M. Montgomery really loved.
Montgomery was prone to bouts of depression, probably because Ewan MacDonald ended up having mental illness. He went on rampages around the house where he was convinced he was condemned to hellfire and could not be saved.
Kind of like Roaring Abel, a character in The Blue Castle.
So much of her art, mirrored Montgomery’s life.
But Montgomery’s end was the most disappointing of all.
The biography failed to mention what has been proven beyond doubt, that Montgomery killed herself.
I know I’m going to come across as callous and unfeeling and I don’t mean to. Unfortunately I don’t understand depression and suicide.
But honestly, it makes me quite angry that she killed herself.
I feel like she had every advantage imaginable.
It almost smacks of hypocrisy that she didn’t buy the optimism she packaged in Anne.
To me L. M. Montgomery, didn’t quite buy what she was selling.
I still love The Blue Castle. Her suicide doesn’t render its themes any less valid.
But this whole situation reminds me of a story my parents once told me about a religous man in Pakistan.
There was once a poor villager who came to listen to his sermons and one of the things this religious man said was that, “If your belief is strong enough, you can walk on water.”
So the man decided to test these words of wisdom. Everyday he had to pay money to the guy who ferried him across the river. One day he decided to walk across the water, and his belief was so strong, that he did it.
He saved so much money, that he wanted to thank the religious man for his wisdom, so he invited him to dinner.
They were going to his home and came to the river and the religious man gestured towards the ferry. The man said, “No. You said if your belief was strong, you could walk across the water.”
The religious man said, “You walk. I’m taking the ferry.”
19 Responses
Heather
11|Jun|2010 1Montgomery’s life was unhappy because she didn’t have the guts to do things that went against her conservative society and “what people thought”. A truly confident woman like Anne would marry a man who stimulated her intellectually, physically, and emotionally — or would have the guts to never marry at all. Women writers like Edith Wharton and George Eliot chose to live independent lives outside traditional Victorian wifehood, reaping both the rewards and suffering the consequences. Montgomery was a product of her upbringing and class. She refused to trust her instincts with regards to the man who would be right for her and ended up in a horrendously oppressive marriage to an insane Protestant minister. She got a good, respectable marriage but an unhappy life
Rukhsana Khan
12|Jun|2010 2Hi Heather,
I agree.
Despite all her brilliant writing and the spunk of her characters to buck societal norms, Montgomery cared way too much for what people thought.
Rukhsana Khan
06|Jul|2013 3Actually maybe I do. I have been both depressed and suicidal at times.
I know the dark. And I know hopelessness.
And so much of the decisions she made came down to status. She couldn’t bear to face a reduction in her social hierarchy, that’s why she married the preacher nut and not the man she loved, so yes, I think she deserved what she got.
As for being judgmental, at least I’m honest about it. I think most people judge each other, we think to ourselves, “What were they thinking?!” But we don’t express these thoughts because that would come across as judgmental.
This is about a woman who put herself out there in her journals. That’s asking to be judged. I just obliged her.
I am in no way making light of depression.
But I do believe that people need to live their lives with a certain set of rules, things they just don’t do, no matter what, and suicide is one of them.
Baskin P.
06|Jul|2013 4Are you a sort of God that you can see into anothers soul? Did you live during that time period? Live the life of a secondhand citizen simply by being a female, no matter how lofty your social standing?
If you had actually wrestled with cronic deep depression and had seriously & honestly come close to sucide then I believe u would be far more understanding and sympathetic. But since I am not a God either, I shall not judge. But I do pity you your arrogance.
Rukhsana Khan
07|Jul|2013 5Unfortunately we cannot see into other people’s lives and souls and really know what they’ve suffered.
I always try to be sympathetic to any suffering, and for the most part I am. But then, yes, I have wrestled with chronic deep depression, was it as chronic or as deep as theirs? I have no idea. I have no way of comparing. I just know that it was really bad and I did seriously want to die.
I remember actually going to the kitchen, taking out the sharp knife and holding it for a long time, very very tempted.
But with myself, the ‘rules’ I lived by absolutely forbade suicide. It just wasn’t an option, so I prayed for death until I found out you’re not supposed to do that either. You’re supposed to pray for relief, but in that prayer I really just wanted death. Instead I got relief, and my life has never been the same.
Perhaps that makes me a tad judgmental, thinking, ‘hey if I could do it, why can’t they?’ I don’t mean to come across that way. But I do think that people need to decide what they stand for, and so many people don’t do that. They don’t have a ‘manifesto’ if you will. And then when they suffer mental illness, then all options are open.
I think that’s dangerous.
C.Webb
10|Mar|2014 6You are very ignorant people. Mental illness is not something you just “snap out of”.
It is wonderful that she was able to write these beautiful books whilst battling with her inner demons.
Shallow and sad.
Rukhsana Khan
11|Mar|2014 7I’m sorry you feel that way. I agree that true mental illness isn’t something you just ‘snap’ out of, but these days everything is considered mental illness, and I think that’s a substitute for people taking responsibility for their actions.
Marianne
19|Nov|2014 8It’s true Montgomery sometimes lacked the courage to stare intolerant people down. Her books are full of bits that placate the socially conservative. But if we can’t tolerate other people’s weakness, perhaps that is a weakness in itself. She wasn’t harming anyone except herself.
In a contribution to a site about ‘Rilla of Ingleside’, someone saw her suicide as partly connected to WW2. This person indicated that she was extremely appalled by the Nazis, which is entirely to her credit. She’d obviously already been extremely shaken by WW1 and found it hard to face another world war. Her husband was in no state to give her any support.
She was probably a naturally suicide prone person. Have you noticed how often it’s mentioned in her work, say in casual conversation between Anne and Susan Baker? This must have been a bit unusual children’s books at the time, especially as suicide was illegal in the UK and probably was in Canada too. It would have sounded a bit ‘off’, but she obviously couldn’t stop herself from introducing the subject.
It wasn’t considerate of the poor person who found the body, but let’s cut the poor woman some slack. This is what depression does to you.
Rukhsana Khan
19|Nov|2014 9Interesting points Marianne.
Honestly I wonder how much of depression is mental illness. Is the mind really that fragile? I wonder.
Marianne
20|Nov|2014 10Well, Rukshana, if she’d just been subjected to one kind of stress, perhaps she could have coped. But have you heard that one of her two sons – I think it was the elder one – was supposed to be a sociopath or a psychopath? I can’t remember now what he did, except annoying people by going round exposing himself.
Also, her husband was mentally ill in what I would call a culture bound way. In mainstream Christianity, if people believe in Hell at all, they don’t expect you to end up there unless you deserve it.
But I suppose you are aware that in the Calvinist sect to which he belonged, God arbitrarily decides to consign most people to Hell before they are even born. Montgomery’s husband was convinced he was predestined to Hell, and nothing could shake him out of it.
Unfortunately, their friends and neighbours would have been no help, quite the reverse. Society had a stigmatising attitude to mental illness, so she couldn’t talk about it. Socialising was more about keeping up appearances than emotional support.
L M Montgomery herself believed in concepts like duty and keeping a stiff upper lip. So Anne is shown as smiling stoically when her sons go off to war. You could see these attitudes as unhelpful. Some people would say they are symptoms of emotional illiteracy.
Maybe she couldn’t shore herself up with the artificial scaffolding of duty and a stiff upper lip any more, and could conceive of no alternative but going totally to pieces.
One of the customs I find particularly annoying in the Montgomery books, is the habit of referring to a married woman as ‘Mrs’ followed by her husband’s full name. I’m sure that the English custom of spouses sharing surnames did not even reach the Celtic parts of the British Isles until the 19th century, and I’m a bit amazed that in Canada, even a woman’s first name disappeared.
Surely, it’s not like that today? Wouldn’t it make a woman feel invisible, as if she didn’t exist?And if she did feel invisible, wouldn’t she find it hard to assert herself or ask for support?
The gossipy parts of Montgomery’s books are delightful, but it’s obvious that she was living in a judgemental society. It was not a community which provided counsellors and support workers.
Rukhsana Khan
26|Nov|2014 11Wow Marianne, interesting observations. You’ve obviously thought these issues through a lot. I didn’t know some of that background information on her.
I’m not sure.
I see things so differently. To me she lived a life of privilege. And there’s always a choice.
Cassandra
06|Jan|2015 12Having read pert near everything published on LM Montgomery and having attempted suicide in my youth (14) I am plenty sympathetic to depression (which is anger turned inwards) and struggling with suicidal impulses and thoughts as I have all my life.
BUT, Lucy Maud made choices that led to her eventual miserable circumstances and each choice was no one’s fault but her own. I rather regret that she put her husband and sons in a poor light by leaving journals that were heavily rewritten and edited by herself. It has diminished her legacy which is not what she intended, she wanted sympathy but she did not and could not reckon on how much society and the world would change.
Lucy Maud wanted fame writ large and she got it. She wanted a respectable husband (not one she loved) and she got it. She wanted children and she got two healthy sons late in life. She also got wealth. But she could not write her way to love, happiness or contentment.
When I read the third journal and some other books I suspected she committed suicide and I was not at all surprised she did.
I still love her books, they are still magical and wonderful fun to read and reread. But much like Mozart or Beethoven, one is meant to enjoy the beautiful music and NOT idolize the person creating the beauty.
In my view all comes from God, people only channel God when such beauty is created.
Ultimately, maybe Lucy Maud was a lost soul in many ways as many people are and she wanted posterity to know how sad she was. But she maligned poor Ewan and her sons (and I don’t deny they had faults) and did not acknowledge her own choices and actions which had a lot to do with how Ewan and her sons acted.
In many ways Lucy Maud resembles my mother who was, at the base it all, a unloved orphan who, in seeking love mistook the idea that fame (in my mother’s case money) would bring the love she really so desperately wanted and while it brings many things, love is not one them.
Kind of the story of the whole world isn’t it?
Rukhsana Khan
09|Jan|2015 13Well said!!!
I started reading her journal. Bought one of them when I went to PEI but when I found out she’d heavily edited it, I thought why bother? It looked like she was trying to portray a sanitized version of her life and I wanted the real details.
Pearl Clover
26|May|2015 14My favourite book by L. M. Montgomery is also The Blue Castle! It’s just lovely and Valancy as a name interesting. I’ve read the first volume of her journals and yes, it’s sad that there has been delated some details but though very much left about her miserable times. 🙁 Times were different then, so perhaps if she had married that poor man, she would have had to leave her selfhonour and to get out of her family and friend circle.
(Sorry about possible language mistakes, English is not my mother language :))
Rebecca
22|Nov|2015 15Your comments are very ignorant. You seem to understand no difference between disappointment and clinical depression. Clinical depression is an imbalance of the chemicals needed for us to function properly, and there is no way to explain the dark cloud that is true depression.
If she had simply been disappointed and regretful that she didn’t marry the man she loved most, she would not be suicidal. You need to do some research and get off your high judgmental horse.
Rukhsana Khan
22|Nov|2015 16Perhaps they are. I happen to believe that the human mind is a lot more sophisticated than just chemicals and imbalances. And people can be depressed but not be suicidal, I do believe that humans have a choice and their moral foundation can affect their behavior beyond their wiring.
Ali Kahustan
30|Nov|2015 17Hi Rukhsana Khan,
Why are you so ignorant? Depression is NOT something you can just “snap out” of. No matter how “priviledged” you are. Stop being so simple-minded. It’s so annoying when people act like they know what’s going on in other people’s minds.
andrew dougal
10|Jan|2016 18Hi Ruksana
I think you are being a bit hard on Montgomery.
She was raised in a very conservative part of what was by modern standards a very conservative culture. It really doesn’t do to judge a person living in the late 19th c by the standards of today.
Montgomery made quite a few bold strides for a country girl from rural Canada. She studied at university, worked on a newspaper and became one of the countries first truly international authors. How many women (or men) of her generation could boast as much?
Her characters are no milk-and-water Victorian stereotypes either ;they are real young girls even allowing for the style of writing of the time.She also takes a good pop at the snobberies and prejudices of her day,although she evidently couldn’t overcome all of them in herself.
I suspect that her nerves and eventual suicide came down to the strain of kicking against convention while at the same time feeling the need to conform to it. It’s not easy being a pioneer.
I also think its unfair to blame her husband. Everything I have read about him seems to show him to be a kind and gentle man who was unlucky enough to suffer from a form of mental illness, not helped by the narrow religiosity he inherited. Some writing also seems to indicate that both he and Montgomery where suffering unknowingly from drug addiction from some of the new fangled remedies of the time.
Having spent a year on powerful drugs – necessary but tough- I can vouch for the extent to which they are mood changers.I was briefed well before hand on the likely effects and given a lot of support, but it still knocked me flat,even knowing that my responses were entirely physical reactions to the chemicals in my body. How much worse if you don’t even know its happening?
Basically she did her best and achieved a lot and she left us some wonderful characters and fine writing. For me she has emphasised the humanity of children and the need to treat them with a little gentleness, some of which she could have done with herself.
Your final comment seems to me to be couched in religious and spiritual values. For myself I don’t think God abandons people who can’t cope. Montgomery did her best as far as a flawed human being can. I hope and believe that she has found the peace, love and happiness she spent her life longing for.
Rukhsana Khan
11|Jan|2016 19Hi Andrew,
Thank you so much for the thoughtfulness of your reply.
Maybe I am being too hard on her. Probably because she really really disappointed me by killing herself!!!
I loved her work, especially The Blue Castle!!! I read so many of her books, even The Story Girl. And I guess it’s human nature to be harsh when your heroines disappoint.
I do hope God has mercy on her.
All the best,
Rukhsana
Search
Categories
Archives
Blogroll
A design creation of Design Disease
Copyright © 2010 Rukhsana Khan | Powered by WordPress